This study critically examines the framework of Nanosyntax and its assumptions about feature decomposition in the context of indefinite expressions. The author challenges the nanosyntactic analysis proposed by Dekier (2021), arguing that certain coexpressions of indefinites stem from semantic underspecification rather than hierarchical structural containment. By introducing an alternative semantic framework based on the work of Degano & Aloni (2025), the study aims to provide a more coherent and predictable account of the syncretism patterns observed in indefinites.

The methodology involves a detailed comparison of Dekier’s hierarchical model with the semantic account, focusing on the indefinites’ map and the implications of each analysis. The author identifies critical shortcomings in Dekier’s approach, particularly the lack of attested morphological containment patterns and the stipulative nature of its semantic arguments. In contrast, the semantic account posits that indefinites can express multiple functions through less restrictive semantics, allowing for a broader range of contextual applicability.

The findings have significant implications for grammar architecture and the understanding of indefinites across languages. By demonstrating that semantic variation and constancy can account for the observed patterns without relying on hierarchical structures, this research invites further exploration into the relationship between semantics and syntax in language theory. Additionally, it raises questions about the diachronic evolution of indefinites, suggesting that changes in usage often reflect semantic shifts rather than structural hierarchies.

Source: glossa-journal.org